PROPAGATION OF ECONOMIC SHOCKS IN HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES AND NETWORKS. THE CASE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Authors

  • Sorin-Nicolae Curcă Romanian Academy, School of Advanced Studies of the Romanian Academy, Doctoral School of Economics, National Institute of Economic Research Costin ”C. Kirițescu”;, Centre for Financial and Monetary Research; ”Victor Slăvescu”; Bucharest, ROMANIA Institute for World Economy, Romanian Academy Bucharest, ROMANIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2026.1-09

Keywords:

economic shocks, complex systems, network structure, shock propagation, hubs, European Union

Abstract

In this paper, we propose an analytical framework for understanding economic shocks from the perspective of systems theory and complexity. Unlike approaches that view shocks primarily as exogenous disturbances, this article argues that they should be understood as processes that emerge within the economic system through interactions among the triggering event, the system’s structure, and transmission mechanisms. In this regard, the economic system is analysed as a structure of interdependencies that can take the form of hierarchical or network-type architectures. The analysis thus highlights that the way these interdependencies are organised influences the dynamics of shocks. In hierarchical structures, propagation tends to be more sequential and easier to localise. At the same time, in networks, the propagation of shocks occurs through multiple channels, making it more sensitive to feedback mechanisms, thresholds, and cumulative effects. The analytical framework developed is applied to the case of the European Union, interpreted as a system of interdependencies characterised by high levels of trade and financial integration but incomplete fiscal integration. The analysis shows that this configuration favours the rapid and differentiated propagation of shocks, accentuating asymmetries among Member States. The paper contributes to the literature on economic shocks by integrating a systemic perspective, highlighting the role of the system’s architecture in their dynamics, and formulating implications for economic policy in interdependent systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V. M., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2012). The network origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 80(5), 1977-2016. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9623

Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Financial Contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 1-33.

Antràs, P. (2020). De-globalisation? Global value chains in the post-COVID-19 age. NBER Working Paper 28115. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28115

Aoki, M. (2001). Toward a comparative institutional analysis. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1086/262109

Bak, P. (1996). How nature works: The science of self-organized criticality. Copernicus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5426-1

Baldwin, R., & Freeman, R. (2021). Risks and global supply chains: What we know and what we need to know. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 153-180. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-051420-113737

Baldwin, R., & Wyplosz, C. (2022). The economics of European integration (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. https://www.mheducation.co.uk/the-economics-of-european-integration-7e-9781526849434-emea-group

Barabási, A.-L. (2016), Network Science. Cambridge University Press. https://networksciencebook.com/

Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509

Battiston, S., Delli Gatti, D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). Default cascades: When does risk diversification increase stability? Journal of Financial Stability, 8(3), 138-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2012.01.002

Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the black box: The credit channel of monetary policy transmission. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.27

Blanchard, O. J., & Quah, D. (1989). The dynamic effects of aggregate demand and supply disturbances. American Economic Review, 79(4), 655-673. https://www.uh.edu/~bsorense/BlanchardQuah1989.pdf

Brunnermeier, M. K. (2009). Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007-2008. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.23.1.77

Claessens, S., Dell’Ariccia, G., Igan, D., & Laeven, L. (2010). Cross-country experiences and policy implications from the global financial crisis. Economic Policy, 25(62), 267-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2010.00244.x

Cochrane, J. H. (1994). Shocks. In: Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 41, 295-364. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(94)00024-7

De Grauwe, P. (2020). Economics of Monetary Union (13th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Dinga, E. (2015). Predicție și predictori în economie. Cercetarea - protocoale și creativitate în cunoaștere. Workshop. Academia Română. https://mone.acad.ro/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Dinga-Predictie-si-predictori-in-economie.pdf

Duarte, P. G., & Hoover, K. D. (2012). Observing shocks. History of Political Economy, 44(Supplement 1), 226-249. https://ideas.repec.org/a/hop/hopeec/v44y2012i5p226-249.html

Elliott, M., Golub, B., & Jackson, M. O. (2014). Financial networks and contagion. American Economic Review, 104(10), 3115-3153. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3115

European Central Bank. Database. https://data.ecb.europa.eu/

Eurostat. Database. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database

Filatova, T., Polhill, G. (2012). Shocks in coupled socio-ecological systems: what are they and how can we model them. In: R. Seppelt, A. A. Voinov, S. Lange, & D. Bankamp (Eds.), International Environmental Modelling and Software Society (iEMSs). International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software Managing Resources of a Limited Planet. https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/files/5363492/H3_0756_Filatova_Polhill.pdf

Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. MIT Press.

Grimm, V., Schmidt, E., & Wissel, C. (1992). On the application of stability concepts in ecology. Ecological Modelling, 63(1-4), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(92)90067-O

Hoover, K. D. (2015). The ontological status of shocks and trends in macroeconomics. Synthese, 192(11), 3509-3532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0503-5

Kivelä, M., Arenas, A., Barthelemy, M., Gleeson, J. P., Moreno, Y., & Porter, M. A. (2014). Multilayer networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 2(3), 203-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnu016

Lane, P. R. (2013). Capital flows in the euro area. European Economy Economic Papers 497. European Union. https://doi.org/10.2765/43795

Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. Chelsea Green Publishing. https://books.google.md/books?vid=ISBN9781603580557&printsec=frontcover&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=true

Mishkin, F. S. (1995). Symposium on the monetary transmission mechanism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4): 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.3

Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A guided tour. Oxford University Press. https://home.iscte-iul.pt/~jmal/mcc/Complexity_-_A_Guided_Tour.pdf

Nchor, D. (2020). Labour mobility as an adjustment mechanism to asymmetric shocks in Europe: evidence from the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. Journal for Labour Market Research, 54, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-020-00282-w

Odum, E. P., Finn, J. T., & Franz, E. H. (1979). Perturbation theory and the subsidy-stress gradient. BioScience, 29(6), 349-352. https://doi.org/10.2307/1307690

Ramey, V. A. (2016). Macroeconomic shocks and their propagation. In: J. B. Taylor & H. Uhlig (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics (Vol. 2, pp. 71-162). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.003

Rosati, D. K. (2017). Asymmetric shocks in the euro area and their implications for economic governance. Acta Oeconomica, 67(S1), 115-134.

Rykiel, E. J. (1985). Towards a definition of ecological disturbance. Australian Journal of Ecology, 10(3), 361-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1985.tb00897.x

Simon, H. A. (1962). The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 106(6), 467-482. https://faculty.sites.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/archive/tesfatsi/ArchitectureOfComplexity.HSimon1962.pdf

Smets, F., & Wouters, R. (2007). Shocks and frictions in US business cycles: A Bayesian DSGE approach. American Economic Review, 97(3), 586-606. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.3.586

Theodoropoulos, S. (2005). Asymmetric Shocks, Structural Rigidities and Adjustment Capability in EMU - A Review. European Research Studies Journal, 8(3-4), 3-20. https://www.ersj.eu/repec/ers/papers/05_p1.pdf

Thirion, G. (2017). European Fiscal Union: Economic rationale and design challenges. CEPS Papers 12160. Centre for European Policy Studies. https://ideas.repec.org/p/eps/cepswp/12160.html

Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. George Braziller. https://tomek.org/files/general_system_theory_foundations_development_applications.pdf

Watts, D. J. (2002). A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(9), 5766-5771. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082090499

Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications. Free Press. https://ru.scribd.com/document/714534951/Markets-and-Hierarchies-Analysis-and-Antitrust-Implications-Oliver-E-Williamson-Z-Library#google_vignette

Downloads


Abstract views: 53

Published

23-06-2026

How to Cite

Curcă, S.-N. (2026). PROPAGATION OF ECONOMIC SHOCKS IN HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES AND NETWORKS. THE CASE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Economy and Sociology, (1). https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2026.1-09