FLEXIBLE WORK MODELS AND FEMALE EMPLOYEE PREFERENCES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2024.2-10

Keywords:

flexible work arrangements, hybrid work culture, remote work, future of work, labour market

Abstract

New arrangement models have quickly become the most common work organisation for many companies, offering employees a better work-life balance and higher job satisfaction. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of these models without a clear understanding of emerging hybrid forms and the support needed to ensure a sustainable and efficient transition. The lack of clear regulatory frameworks and adequate infrastructure has created challenges for both employers and employees, highlighting the need for strategic policies and investments to support the sustainable development of the new forms of work.

This study explores the impact of new working models on employee satisfaction and productivity in post-pandemic Moldova. Using a questionnaire survey and an Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression model, the research evaluates employees’ preferences for traditional, hybrid, and remote work arrangements. The findings indicate a growing inclination toward hybrid work models, which offer flexibility and work-life balance. However, full adaptation remains hindered by limited digital infrastructure, employer concerns over productivity, and insufficient policy support. While remote work is valued for its flexibility, employers in Moldova express reservations about its impact on oversight and collaboration. The study also highlights the role of vocational education and training institutions in addressing skill gaps and fostering innovation to support evolving labor market needs. The novelty of this research lies in its contextualized analysis of work model transformations in Moldova, offering insights and recommendations for enhancing workforce resilience and economic competitiveness.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barath, M., & Schmidt, D. A. (2022a). Work from Home as a Tool for More Efficient Business. In: P. Madzík, & M. Askarnia (Eds), The Poprad Economic and Management Forum 2022: Conference Proceedings from International Scientific Conference, 10th-11th November 2022 (pp. 284-295). Poprad, Slovakia. https://www.pemf-conference.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/PEMF_2022_Proceedings_Final.pdf#page=285

Decker, R., Daroon, J. (2024). Research + Insights: Emerging Labor Models. https://www.shrm.org/mena/executive-network/insights/people-strategy/research-insights-emerging-labor-markets

Bloom, N. (2020). How working from home works out. Stanford University, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research. https://siepr.stanford.edu/research/publications/how-working-home-works-out

Bolino, M. C., Kelemen, T. K., & Matthews, S. H. (2020). Working 9-to-5? A review of research on nonstandard work schedules. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(2), 188-211. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2440

Buonomo, I., Ferrara, B., Pansini, M., & Benevene, P. (2023). Job Satisfaction and Perceived Structural Support in Remote Working Conditions - The Role of a Sense of Community at Work. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 20(13), 6205. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20136205

Carroll, N., & Conboy, K. (2020). Normalising the “new normal”: Changing tech-driven work practices under pandemic time pressure. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102186

Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., & Michailidis, E. (2018). Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886

Cooper, C. D., & Kurland, N. B. (2002). Telecommuting, professional isolation, and employee development in public and private organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4), 511-532. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.145

Dien, A. N., Pratomo, D. S., & Pangestuty, F. W. (2023). Internet utilization and Indonesian female entrepreneurs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2), 2273347. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2273347

Gratton, L. (2021). Four principles to ensure hybrid work is productive work. MIT Sloan Management Review, 62, 11A -16A. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/four-principles-ensure-hybrid-work-is-productive/docview/2471848716/se-2

Haines, V. Y., St-Onge, S., & Archambault, M. (2002). Environmental and Person Antecedents of Telecommuting Outcomes. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 14(3), 32-50. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2002070103

Hajal, G. E. (2022). Teleworking and the jobs of tomorrow. Research in Hospitality Management, 12(1), 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/22243534.2022.2080953

Halford, S. (2005). Hybrid workspace: Re-spatialisations of work, organisation and management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 20(1), 19-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2005.00141.x

International Labour Organization (ILO). (2020). ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work (Third Edition). https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@dgreports/@dcomm/documents/briefingnote/wcms_743146.pdf

Iqbal, K. M. J., Khalid, F., & Barykin, S. B. (2021). Hybrid Workplace: The Future of Work. In: Handbook of Research on Future Opportunities for Technology Management Education (pp. 28-48). Hershey: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8327-2.ch003

Mitchell, A. (2023). Collaboration technology affordances from virtual collaboration in the time of COVID-19 and post-pandemic strategies. Information Technology & People, 36(5), 1982-2008. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-01-2021-0003

Pulido-Martos, M., Cortés-Denia, D., & Lopez-Zafra, E. (2021). Teleworking in times of COVID-19: Effects on the acquisition of personal resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 685275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685275

Sewell, G., & Taskin, L. (2015). Out of sight, out of mind in a new world of work? Autonomy, control, and spatiotemporal scaling in telework. Organization Studies, 36(11), 1507-1529.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615593587

Smoder, A. (2021). Remote work in pandemic conditions - Selected issues. Polityka Społeczna, 566-567(5-6), 26-35. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.2582

Tavares, A. I. (2017). Telework and health effects review. International Journal of Healthcare, 3(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijh.v3n2p30

Williams, S., & Shaw, N. (2025). Hybrid working - Benefits and challenges for productivity and performance. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 74(1), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-05-2023-0230

Yang, E., Kim, Y., & Hong, S. (2021). Does working from home work? Experience of working from home and the value of hybrid workplace post-COVID-19. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 25(1), 50-76. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-04-2021-0015

Zwanka, R., & Buff, C. L. (2021). COVID-19 generation: A conceptual framework of the consumer behavioral shifts to be caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 33(1), 58-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2020.1771646

Downloads


Abstract views: 410

Published

04-12-2024

How to Cite

Gribincea, C., Heghea, E., Ciobanu, M., & Ungur, C. (2024). FLEXIBLE WORK MODELS AND FEMALE EMPLOYEE PREFERENCES. Economy and Sociology, (2). https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2024.2-10