GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PARITY-SPECIFIC FERTILITY TRANSITION MODELS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2024.1-09

Keywords:

male demographic fertility, parity patterns, transition to the first, second, and third child, GGS, Moldova

Abstract

Most demographic studies focus on the reproductive behavior of women, leaving a gap in the understanding of male demographic fertility. New fertility patterns in recent decades and the increasing involvement of men in family planning and the number of children within a couple have provided solid grounds for analyzing male reproductive behavior in investigating fertility determinants. The study aims to explore the differences in parity patterns between men and women in Moldova, comparing the age at which men become parents for the first time, the number of biological children over their lifetime, and the transition to the first, second, and third child. Using data from the Generations and Gender Survey conducted in 2020, the research focuses on cohorts of men and women born between 1950 and 1989. To test the hypotheses that men have a longer reproductive lifespan, start their reproductive activity later than women, and registers a higher number of biological children, the following methodologies are employed: Analysis of the mean number of biological children for selected birth cohorts 1950-1985; Determination of the proportion of men who remain childless by the end of life and the proportion of women who remain childless by the end of the reproductive period; Evaluation of the transition to the birth of children of different parities for men and women using probability models. The results indicate significant gender differences: men become parents, on average, three years later than women and have a lower average number of children over their lifetime. Additionally, the proportion of men who remain childless throughout their lives is significantly higher compared to women who have completed their reproductive period. These findings suggest substantial differences in the reproductive behavior of men and women, contributing to a broader and more complete picture of population dynamics and fertility trends.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alich, D. (2007). Fatherhood in Russia between 1970-2004. The male perspective if family and fertility bahavior in a changing society. Available at: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/publications/files/3722_1265809219_1_Full%20Text.pdf

Dudel, S., & Klüsener, C. (2019). Male Fertility Data for 16 High-Income Countries: Methods and Data Description. MPIDR Technical Report TR-2019-01.

Dudel, C., Cheng , Y., & Klüsener, S. (2020). The Unexplored Parental Age Gap in an Era of Fertility Postponement. https://doi.org/10.4054/MPIDR-WP-2020-018

Fox, J., Klüsener, S., & Myrskyla, M. (2019). Is a Positive Relationship Between Fertilityand Economic Development Emerging at the SubNational Regional Level? Theoretical Considerations. European Jurnal of Population, 35, 487–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680018-9485-1

Gagauz, O. (2012). Familia contemporană între tradiţional şi modern. Chișinău: „Tipogr.-Sirius” SRL .

Gagauz, O. (2021). Chisinau Youth on the Path from Romantic Relationships to Marriage. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 3, 103-110. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250009360-9

Gagauz, O. (2021). De ce femeile au venituri mai mici decât bărbații pe tot parcursul vieții? (29 p.). Chişinău: Tipogr. „Foxtrot".

Gagauz, O., & Grigoraș, E. (2018). Dinamica fertilităţii în Republica Moldova şi ţările ex-sovietice din regiunea Europeană: convergenţe şi divergenţe. Calitatea Vietii, 4(29), p. 365-392. ISSN - ISSNe 1018-0389

Gagauz, O., Buciuceanu-Vrabie, M., Pahomii, I., Ștîrba, V., Tabac, T., & Grigoraș, E. (2021). Populația Republicii Moldova la 30 de ani de independență: provocări principale și politici necesare. Chisinau: Institutul Naţional de Cercetări Economice, Centrul Cercatări Demografice. https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.ccd.2021.978-9975-89-248-3

Grigoraș, E. (2019). Particularities of fertility transition: comprehensive comparative analysis in Republic of Moldova and selected European countries. Demography and social economy, 1 (35), p. 53-68. https://doi.org/10.15407/dse2019

Grigoraș, E., & Gagauz, O. (2022). Fertility transition from traditional to modern model in Moldova: exploration in base on the “generation and gender survey. Economy and Sociology (1). https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2022.1-09

Jin, Y., Grunwald, O., & Rijken, A. (2024). How to calculate the number of children in the Generations and Gender Survey Round 2 (Version 2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10889300

Keilman, N., Tymicki, K., & Skirbekk, V. (2014). Measures for human reproduction should be linked to both men and women. International Journal of Population Research, 2014 (1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/908385

Kyzlinková, R., & Šťastná, A. (2018). Fatherhood in a Changing Society: Shifts in Male Fertility Patterns. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418754565

Lesthaeghe, R. (2020). The second demographic transition, 1986- 2020: sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation-a global update. Genus, 76:10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00077-4

Miettinen, A., Rotkirch, A., Szalma, I., Donno, A., & Tanturri, M. (2015). Increasing childlessness in Europe: time trends and country differences. Families and Societies, Series Working Paper.

Nikitović, V., Magdalenic, I., & Stanojevic, D. (2024). Patterns of female and male fertility in Serbia based on the results of the 2022 Census. https://doi.org/10.59954/PPYCDSP2024.10

Oláh, L., Kotowska, I., & Richter, R. (2018). The New Roles of Men and Women and Implications for Families and Societies. In G. G. Doblhammer (Ed.), A Demographic Perspective on Gender, Family and Health in Europe. pp. 51-64. Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72356-3_4

Schoumaker, B. (2019). Male Fertility Around the World and Over Time: How Different is it from Female Fertility? Population and Development Review, 45 (3), p. 459-487. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12273

Shephard, A. (2019). Marriage Market Dynamics, Gender, and the Age Gap. PIER Working Paper, 19-003. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3357693

Szalma, I., Donno, A., Tanturri, M., Miettinen, A., & Rotkirch, A. (2015). Increasing childlessness in Europe: time trends and country differences. Families and Societies, Series Working Paper, 33.

Szoltysek, M., Klusener, S., Poniat, R., & Gruber, S. (2017). The Patriarchy Index: A new measure of gender and generational inequalities in the past. Cross-Cultural Research. Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Working Paper., 51(3), p. 228–262.

Zeman, K., Beaujouan, E., Brzozowska, Z., & Sobotka, T. (2018). Cohort fertility decline in low fertility countries: Decomposition using parity progression ratios. Demographic Research, 38, p. 651-690. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.25

Republic of Moldova – Generations and Gender Study (2020). Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Republic of Moldova, National Bureau of Statistics (study sample), UNFPA, NIDI-GGP (partner and distributor). Chisinau: INCE. 476 p.

Downloads


Abstract views: 151

Published

03-07-2024

How to Cite

Grigoraș, E. (2024). GENDER DIFFERENCES IN PARITY-SPECIFIC FERTILITY TRANSITION MODELS. Economy and Sociology, (1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2024.1-09