FOR A SOCIOLOGY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN

Authors

  • Francesco Vespasiano Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Sannio, Department of Law, Economics, Management and Quantitative Methods, Benevento, Italy https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3727-6257

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2024.1-02

Keywords:

Mediterranean, sociology, culture, civilization, peace, innovation

Abstract

The great metamorphosis of the main sociological factors challenges us to abandon the presumption of colonization and the paradigm of the clash of civilizations and invites us to become aware of the changing demographic, political, economic, and cultural reality, and commits us to adopt a new analytical paradigm to understand and manage the transformation. The article proposes a synthetic analysis of this change, starting with statistical data on the migration of populations from the poorest countries on Earth to the richest ones. The analysis focuses on what is happening in the vast area of the Mediterranean. The history of the Mediterranean, this is the hypothesis put forward in the article, could help us to reflect innovatively on the demographic and cultural dynamics that are taking place in a particularly significant way. The reason for which it is hypothesized that the Mediterranean could be the privileged social place where we can reflect on the metamorphosis we are experiencing lies in the long tradition of welcoming diversity and in the capacity for the coexistence of religions, cultures, and civilizations that, over the centuries, have been the force thanks to which the whole world has been dominated, despite the clashes that historiography has unquestionably shown us. The article shows the important commitment of the leaders of the different world religions in generating spaces for encounters and dialogue between cultural diversities that cannot be analyzed within the paradigm of confrontation but require to be understood within the paradigm of confrontation and responsible coexistence. The work done so far clearly shows the possibility of dialogue between diversities, as well as pointing the way forward to socialize all different cultures to be together, without clashing for dominance; in this task, the reflections of Pope Francis and Edgar Morin on the concepts of brotherhood and fraternity appear particularly useful.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abulafia, D. (2012). The Sea. A Human History of the Mediterranean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Beck, U. (2016). The Metamorphosis of the World. Cambridge (UK): Polity Press.

Bellow, S. (1976). To Jerusalem and Back. New York: The Viking Press.

Bizzeti, P. (2020). Mediterraneo, frontiera di pace. La Civiltà Cattolica, 4075, 56-67. https://www.laciviltacattolica.it/articolo/mediterraneo-frontiera-di-pace/

Bongiovanni, S., & Tanzarella, S. (Eds.). (2019). Con tutti i naufraghi della storia: La Teologia dopo Veritatis Gaudium nel contesto del Mediterraneo. Trapani: Il pozzo di Giacobbe.

Braudel, F. (1949). La Méditerranée et le monde méditerranéen à l’époque de Philippe II. Paris: A. Colin.

Braudel, F., & Duby, G. (1999). La Méditerranée. Les homme et l’héritage. Paris: Flammarion.

Castells, M. (1997). The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blakwell Publishers.

Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR). (2023). https://cebr.com/reports/world-economic-league-table-2023/

Courban, A., Floridi, L., Repole, R., & Virgili, R. (2021). Il mosaico della fraternità, Magnano (BI): Qiqajon.

Dahrendorf, R. (1996). Economic Opportunity, Civil Society, and Political Liberty. Development and Change. International Institute of Social Studies, 27(2), 229-249.

Godelier, M. (2007). Au fondement des sociétés humaines. Ce que nous apprend l’anthropologie. Paris: Éditions Albin Michel.

Godelier, M. (2021). Communauté, société, culture. Trois clés pour comprendre les identités en conflit. Paris: CNRS editions.

Hoffman, M. (2000). Empathy and Moral Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Huntington, S. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72, 3, 22-49. http://www.guillaumenicaise.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/huntington_clash-of-civlizations.pdf

Huntington, S. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2022a). Facts and Figures 2022. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/facts-figures-2022/index/

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2022b). Report. https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/2022/11/24/ff22-internet-use/

Margalit, A. (1996). The Decent Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew Effect in Science. Science, 159, 56-63, january 5.

Morin, E. (2019). La Fraternité. Pourquoi? Résister à la cruauté du monde. Paris: Éditions Actes Sud.

Pope, Francis. (2019a). Address of his holiness pope francis. In: Theology after Veritatis Gaudium in the context of the Mediterranean: conference Naples, 21th june 2019

Pope, Francis. (2019b). Letter of the Holy Father Francis to the Pilgrim People of God in Germany, june 29.

Pope, Francis. (2019c). Speech at the interreligious meeting at the Founder’s Memorial. Abu Dhabi, february 4.

Sennett, R. (2003). Respect: The Formation of Character in a World of Inequality. London: The Pinguin Press.

Smith, A. (1759). The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edinburgh: Millar & Bell.

Stein, E. (1917). On the Problem of Empathy. Washington: ICS Publications.

Thurow, L. C. (1980). The Zero-Sum Society. New York: Basic Books.

Tomasello, M. (2009). Why We Cooperate. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Worldbank. (2023). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD?year_high_desc=true

Downloads


Abstract views: 38

Published

05-06-2024

How to Cite

Vespasiano, F. (2024). FOR A SOCIOLOGY OF THE MEDITERRANEAN. Economy and Sociology, (1). https://doi.org/10.36004/nier.es.2024.1-02